Historical photgraphs of the Old Bridge, from the South and then from the North.
The significance of Stirling old Bridge insofar as we are concerned is that, historically, it was the only bridge access from the South of the river, through what we know as Cornton, to the north.
This is one of the most critical river crossings in Scotland. As “Gateway to the Highlands”, Stirling is of tremendous strategic importance, and the bridge here was the main crossing point of the River Forth until the early 1800s.
Robert Sibbald (1641-1722) was a physician and geographer. He founded what became the Royal Botanic Gardens in Edinburgh, and also the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. In 1693 he wrote about Stirling in Theatrum Scotiae and within the text is reference to the old bridge as follows: –
The King’s Park lies at the very Foot of the Castle, and the City stands on the Back of a Hill toward the South. It is enclosed with a Wall, and toward the North, it is bounded with the River Forth, which crossed by a Bridge in that Place.
The Bridge is of hewen Stone, and fortified with an Iron-Gate. It consists of four stately Arches, and lies South and North. The Ships at full Tide come up to the Bridge, and the Haven is a little below the same.
That “Old Bridge”, that we know today, was not the first! The present “Stirling Old Bridge” was built in the 1400s or 1500s, replacing a succession of timber bridges although on the “Heraldry of the World” Web site in relation to the Arms of the Burgh of Stirling there is a suggestion that there was a previous stone bridge c. 860: –
Undoubtedly the best-known of the previous timber bridges was one that stood nearby, when Sir William Wallace and Sir Andrew Moray defeated Edward I’s forces at the Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
Record of “Trove Scotland” antiquity No SC 2430899 et seq: –
The foundations of two piers of a bridge earlier than the 15th century one were discovered in 1905 some 65 yards upstream from the later bridge. The piers were about 28 feet long by 14 feet broad. They were 25 feet apart, the centre of the northeast one being about 25 yards from the Left Bank, and that of the southwest one between 25 and 30 yards from the right bank. These details were confirmed during the drought of 1955.
The word pons appears on three mid 15th century maps and a bridge is represented on the Common seal of the burgh of Stirling in 1296, one year earlier than Wallace’s battle in which the breaking down of the bridge is traditionally an episode.
The tradition implies that the bridge was wooden. and the representation of a stone bridge on the seal is probably a convention. In 1304 an allusion to boats suggests no bridge was available. In 1305 a bridge presumably of timber was repaired. Between 1361 and 1391 a ferry replaced the bridge. In 1407 the bridge was said to be very ruinous. The work carried out then was evidently of some importance and payments to the fabric are recorded in 1408 and 1415. This structure may again have been in wood, as the possibility of it being broken is mentioned by an English spy between 1424 and 1437.
No trace of this bridge is visible at normal low tides.
At or about the time that this bridge was built King James V, at only seven years of age, was crowned at the Castle after his father, James IV had been killed at the battle of Flodden.
Also at or about the same time the Great Hall at Stirling Castle was built.
Now Category A-listed for its historical importance, it was on the Old Bridge that John Hamilton (1547-71), Archbishop of St. Andrews, was put to death.
He was executed in his full regalia having been linked to the murders of Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley (1545-67), and James Stuart, 1st Earl of Moray (c. 1531-70).
In what was a wasted piece of vandalism in 1745 one of the bridge arches was blown up by General Blakeney in order to prevent the Jacobite Highland army entering the town on their way south.
The Army simply forded the river further upstream. According to many reports the Bridge was rebuilt 4 years later, however in her book “By Allan Water” Katherine Steuart tells us of something which makes much sense: –
”… a few hours after the blowing up of St Ninians Church, the news was received in the Carse with great thankfulness that the army of Charles was fording the river at Frew and with all speed retreating to the north…”
“…His Majesty’s Army were busy, night and day, repairing Stirling Brig for the passage of the King’s Army…”
“It was a wonderful day at Brigend, that house which lay so well in the line of Scotland’s history, when after the bridge was restored, the King’s Army came slowly over Corntoun, preceded by the Argyllshire Highlanders and a body of Dragoons. Then came more foot soldiers, and then the round-faced Duke of Cumberland, who was hailed as a deliverer by the whole district, so lately harried by the Highlanders”
Permanent alterations and repairs to the bridge therefore are more likely to have been undertaken after the hurried repairs of the King’s Army. They included the renewal of parapets and the truncation of the pedestrian refuges which formerly had roofs and crow stepped gables. There were, originally, archways at each end of the bridge and the one to the north-east end had an iron gate which was replaced by small square pillars with pyramidal finials, still extant . Sentry boxes can be seen in Slezer’s painting of 1731: –
Cornton - Our Story 